Development of Indigenous Biofilm for Enhanced Biogas Production from Palm Oil Mill Effluent
Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences
Volume 39 No. 1, November 2017, Pages 1-8
Md Zahangir Alam1,*, Nurfarhana Abdul Hanid1
1Bioenvironmental Engineering Research Center (BERC), Dept. of Biotechnology Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
*Corresponding author: email@example.com
Biogas, biofilm, palm oil mill effluent
Palm oil mill effluent (POME), high content of organic substances can be a great source for production of renewable energy i.e. biogas through microbial biodegradation. The production of biogas has widely been discovered, however, it shows a problem with the low yield of biogas produced. Thus, in order to overcome this problem, a process was used by using indigenous biofilm as a simultaneous pretreatment (hydrolysis) and biogas production. The studies on isolation, purification and screening of biofilm producing bacteria were conducted to evaluate the simultaneous pretreatment and biogas production. The results showed that the developed biofilm enhanced the biogas production with the operating pH, total suspended solid (TSS) and biofilm which were found to be 4-8, 1.5- 4.5 % and 2-4 g respectively. Based on the experiment conducted, the optimum conditions for the biogas production were at pH 8, TSS of 3.0% and biofilm used of 3 g and the highest biogas yield was 382 ml within 5 days of anaerobic digestion. Thus, anaerobic digestion of POME using indigenous biofilm to produce biogas at high yield could be an alternative and effective solution to reduce the source of pollution to the environment.
CITE THIS ARTICLE
Alam, Md Zahangir, et al. “Development of Indigenous Biofilm for Enhanced Biogas Production from Palm Oil Mill Effluent.” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 39.1 (2017): 1-8.
Alam, M. Z., & Hanid, N. A. (2017). Development of Indigenous Biofilm for Enhanced Biogas Production from Palm Oil Mill Effluent. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 39(1), 1-8.
Alam, Md Zahangir, and Nurfarhana Abdul Hanid. “Development of Indigenous Biofilm for Enhanced Biogas Production from Palm Oil Mill Effluent.” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 39, no. 1 (2017): 1-8.
Alam, M.Z. and Hanid, N.A., 2017. Development of Indigenous Biofilm for Enhanced Biogas Production from Palm Oil Mill Effluent. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 39(1), pp.1-8.
Alam, MZ, Hanid, NA. Development of Indigenous Biofilm for Enhanced Biogas Production from Palm Oil Mill Effluent. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences. 2017;39(1):1-8.
 Basiron, Y. (2013). Malaysian supply and demand of palm oil: challenges and opportunities until 2020. In Proceedings of the oil world outlook conference 2013. Hamburg, Germany.
 Chin, May Ji, Phaik Eong Poh, Beng Ti Tey, Eng Seng Chan, and Kit Ling Chin. “Biogas from palm oil mill effluent (POME): Opportunities and challenges from Malaysia’s perspective.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 26 (2013): 717-726.
 Ahmed, Yunus, Zahira Yaakob, Parul Akhtar, and Kamaruzzaman Sopian. “Production of biogas and performance evaluation of existing treatment processes in palm oil mill effluent (POME).” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 42 (2015): 1260-1278.
 McDougald, Diane, Scott A. Rice, Nicolas Barraud, Peter D. Steinberg, and Staffan Kjelleberg. “Should we stay or should we go: mechanisms and ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal.” Nature Reviews Microbiology 10, no. 1 (2012): 39-50.
 APHA. (2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, in, 21st edn, American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington, DC.
 Djordjevic, D., M. Wiedmann, and L. A. McLandsborough. “Microtiter plate assay for assessment of Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation.” Applied and environmental microbiology 68, no. 6 (2002): 2950-2958.
 Hartree, E. Fo. “Determination of protein: a modification of the Lowry method that gives a linear photometric response.” Analytical biochemistry 48, no. 2 (1972): 422-427.
 Leboffe, M., & Pierce, B. (2010). Microbiology. Englewood, Colo.: Morton Pub. Co. McDougald, D., Rice, S.
 Singh, Rajni, Namita Gupta, Vineet Kumar Goswami, and Rani Gupta. “A simple activity staining protocol for lipases and esterases.” Applied microbiology and biotechnology 70, no. 6 (2006): 679-682.
 Geng, Zhi, Suiyi Zhu, Yang Yu, Ying Lu, Rao Lin, Shujun Guo, Dejun Bian, Xia Yang, Mingxin Huo, and Hongliang Huo. “Novel porous polyethersulfone beads as matrix to immobilize Comamonas testosteroni.” Chemical Research in Chinese Universities 31, no. 4 (2015): 645-650.
 Muralidhar, R. V?, R. R. Chirumamila, R? Marchant, and P. Nigam. “A response surface approach for the comparison of lipase production by Candida cylindracea using two different carbon sources.” Biochemical Engineering Journal 9, no. 1 (2001): 17-23.
 Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F., & Stensel, H. (2003). Wastewater engineering. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
 Sadaka, S., & Engler, C. (2003). Effects of Initial Total Solids on Composting of Raw Manure with Biogas Recovery. Compost Science & Utilization, 11(4), 361-369.
 Langer, Susanne, Daniel Schropp, Frank R. Bengelsdorf, Maazuza Othman, and Marian Kazda. “Dynamics of biofilm formation during anaerobic digestion of organic waste.” Anaerobe 29 (2014): 44-51.
 Fernández, N., Díaz, E., Amils, R., & Sanz, J. (2007). Analysis of Microbial Community during Biofilm Development in an Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment Reactor. Microbial Ecology, 56(1), 121-132.