Removal of Selected Heavy Metals in Acid Mine Drainage using Chemical Precipitation Method

Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences
Volume 57, No. 1, May 2019, Pages 121-130

Norashikin Ahmad Kamal1,*, Lee Gooyong2

1 Faculty of Civil Engineering , Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, 40450, Selangor, Malaysia
2 Korea Water Corporation (K Water), Daejeon, South Korea
*Corresponding author: norashikin7349@salam.uitm.edu.my

Cite this article
MLA
Norashikin, Ahmad Kamal, et al. "Removal of Selected Heavy Metals in Acid Mine Drainage using Chemical Precipitation Method." Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 57.1 (2019): 121-130.
APA

Norashikin, A. K., & Lee, G.(2019). Removal of Selected Heavy Metals in Acid Mine Drainage using Chemical Precipitation Method. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 57(1), 121-130.
Chicago
Norashikin Ahmad Kamal, and Lee Gooyong."Removal of Selected Heavy Metals in Acid Mine Drainage using Chemical Precipitation Method." Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences. 57, no. 1 (2019): 121-130.
Harvard
Norashikin, A.K., Lee, G., 2019. Removal of Selected Heavy Metals in Acid Mine Drainage using Chemical Precipitation Method. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 57(1), pp. 121-130.
Vancouver

Norashikin AK, Lee G. Removal of Selected Heavy Metals in Acid Mine Drainage using Chemical Precipitation Method. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences. 2019;57(1): 121-130.

KEYWORDS

Acid Mine Drainage; Active Treatment; absorbents

ABSTRACT

The major problem confronting Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) in the mining industry is the remediation method. Active treatment used large amount of chemicals and normally require high cost to operate. Treatment causes other environmental problems such as the production of sludge. While long duration mechanism took from passive treatment is a disadvantage for industry. Although passive treatment is less costly compared to active treatment, it usually takes months or years to treat the AMD from mining and only applied at abandoned mining site. In addition, passive treatment requires greater space during the treatment processes. Insufficient land use and unsuitable topography nowadays makes passive treatment hard to apply. Due to that reason, batch tests have been conducted to study on the diffusion of alkaline in different length and concentration of modified ceramic membrane. The optimal surface area and alkaline concentration were identified in order to develop semi-passive treatment experiment. Column experiment had been conducted to study on the efficiency of semi-passive treatment for neutralization of AMD. Results shows that chemical diffusion increased with increased of alkaline concentration and different surface area also influenced rate of diffusion. A total alkalinity for 20g is highest compared to 5g at 40250 mg/l and 23750 mg/l, respectively. Larger surface area makes alkaline particles easily spread. Therefore, ceramic membrane with 8cm gives the largest surface area compared to 2cm ceramic membrane. Results from sampling and analysis of treated effluent on a daily basis over 4 months period show the efficiencies of column experiment for increasing pH and alkalinity, removing of SO24- and selected heavy metals from effluent. As the time duration of semi-passive depends on the alkaline concentration in the column, thus it suffers limitations once the alkaline material is fully utilized. Column experiments showed a high percentage of heavy metals removal, with removal values of Cadmium, Ferum, Manganese and Zinc at 22.73%, 93.24%, 88.88% and 98.50%, respectively. Extensive research should be conducted thoroughly to obtain the optimum performance and characterization of semi-passive treatment for AMD by using different media as absorbents, such as polyurethane or activated carbon.

REFERENCES

[1] Zhang, Ting, Zhihong Tu, Guining Lu, Xingchun Duan, Xiaoyun Yi, Chuling Guo, and Zhi Dang. "Removal of heavy metals from acid mine drainage using chicken eggshells in column mode." Journal of environmental management 188 (2017): 1-8.
[2] Feng, D., C. Aldrich, and H. Tan. "Treatment of acid mine water by use of heavy metal precipitation and ion exchange." Minerals Engineering 13, no. 6 (2000): 623-642.
[3] Yadav, H. L. & Jamal, A. (2017). Treatment Of Acid Mine Drainage using A Sandstone Column. J. Chem. 10 ( 3) : 891-896
[4] Tru?a, Roxana M., Ioan D. Br?hai?a, Cristian I. Pop, C?lin Baciu, and Gabriela Popi?a. "Batch experiment to test the limestone treatment on two types of acid mine water." Advances in Environmental Sciences 9, no. 1 (2017): 92-98.
[5] Matlock, Matthew M., Brock S. Howerton, and David A. Atwood. "Chemical precipitation of heavy metals from acid mine drainage." Water research 36, no. 19 (2002): 4757-4764.
[6] Tabelin, Carlito, Asuka Sasaki, Toshifumi Igarashi, Shingo Tomiyama, Mylah Villacorte-Tabelin, Mayumi Ito, and Naoki Hiroyoshi. "Prediction of acid mine drainage formation and zinc migration in the tailings dam of a closed mine, and possible countermeasures." In MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 268, p. 06003. EDP Sciences, 2019.
[7] Ahmed, Ibrahim Galadima, Sulaiman Mohammed, Abdurrahman Abubakar, and Abdulkarim Ali. "Phytoremediation: A Preeminent Alternative Method for Bioremoval of Heavy Metals from Environment." Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology 10, no. 1 (2018): 59-71.
[8] Jang, Min, and Hyunho Kwon. "Pilot-scale tests to optimize the treatment of net-alkaline mine drainage." Environmental geochemistry and health 33, no. 1 (2011): 91-101.
[9] Johnson, D. Barrie, and Kevin B. Hallberg. "Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review." Science of the total environment 338, no. 1-2 (2005): 3-14.
[10] Aggarwal, Chahat. "A Report on Studies on Acid Mine Drainage Generation and Its Effect on Mining Equipment." Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani. 2017.
[11] Zagury, Gerald J., Viktors I. Kulnieks, and Carmen M. Neculita. "Characterization and reactivity assessment of organic substrates for sulphate-reducing bacteria in acid mine drainage treatment." Chemosphere 64, no. 6 (2006): 944-954.
[12] Neculita, Carmen Mihaela, Yves Dudal, and Gerald J. Zagury. "Using fluorescence-based microplate assay to assess DOM-metal binding in reactive materials for treatment of acid mine drainage." Journal of Environmental Sciences 23, no. 6 (2011): 891-896.
[13] Damodaran, Srinivasan, and Lev Razumovsky. "Role of surface area-to-volume ratio in protein adsorption at the air–water interface." Surface Science 602, no. 1 (2008): 307-315.
[14] Bwapwa, Joseph Kapuku. "A Review of Acid Mine Drainage in a Water-Scarce Country: Case of South Africa."
[15] Cravotta III, Charles A. "Relations among pH, sulfate, and metals concentrations in anthracite and bituminous coal-mine discharges, Pennsylvania." In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage (7th ICARD), St. Louis, Missouri. 2006.
[16] Fu, Fenglian, and Qi Wang. "Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review." Journal of environmental management 92, no. 3 (2011): 407-418.