Comparative Experimental and Numerical Investigations on the Characteristics of Air/Water Slug Flow in Horizontal Pipes

Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences
Volume 65, No. 2, January 2020, Pages 264-285

Hussain H. Al-Kayiem1,*, Zahid I. Al-Hashimy2, Rune W. Time3, Zena K. Kadhim4
1 Mechanical Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia
2 Iraq Ministry of Oil, OPDC, Baghdad, Iraq
3 University of Stavanger, N 4036 Stavanger, Norway
4 Mechanical Engineering Department, Wasit University, Wasit, Iraq
*Corresponding author: hussain_kayiem@utp.edu.my

KEYWORDS

Slug flow; slug frequency; slug length; slug initiation; VOF

ABSTRACT

Prediction of flow conditions at which slugs are formed and characterisation of slugging are critical technological problems that are not fully resolved yet. This study experimentally and numerically investigated the characteristics of air/water slug flow by documenting the effect of different air and water superficial velocities on water slug length and frequency. The investigations focused on slug frequency, slug length, slug initiation in the pipe and liquid holdup. Experiments were conducted using a 0.074-m-diameter horizontal acrylic pipe with an 8.0-m length. A high-speed video camera was used to obtain the image sequence of the slug flow covering ranges of 0.7–3.5 and 0.65–1.23 m/s air and water superficial velocities, respectively. Numerical simulations were performed using a 3D implicit unsteady volume of fluid model with STAR-CCM+ code. The comparison of simulation experiments exhibited a reasonable agreement within a 10.4% relative error. The time traces of water holdup indicated that slugs are formed as a result of local instability at the wave crest rather than due to the instability of the entire wave. Mean water slug lengths ranged within 3.5–15 Dpipe. By increasing the air superficial velocity by 50% and fixing the water superficial velocity, the slug frequency decreased by 0.25 Hz. When the air superficial velocity was fixed and the water superficial velocity increased by 50%, the frequency rate was increased by 1.88 Hz.

CITE THIS ARTICLE

MLA
Hussain, H. Al-Kayiem, et al. “Comparative Experimental and Numerical Investigations on the Characteristics of Air/Water Slug Flow in Horizontal Pipes.” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 65.2 (2020): 264-285.

APA
Hussain, H. A., Zahid, I. A., Rune, W. T., & Zena, K. K.(2020). Comparative Experimental and Numerical Investigations on the Characteristics of Air/Water Slug Flow in Horizontal Pipes. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 65(2), 264-285.

Chicago
Hussain H. Al-Kayiem, Zahid I. Al-Hashimy, Rune W. Time, and Zena K. Kadhim. “Comparative Experimental and Numerical Investigations on the Characteristics of Air/Water Slug Flow in Horizontal Pipes.” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences. 65, no. 2 (2020): 264-285.

Harvard
Hussain, H.A., Zahid, I.A., Rune, W.T., and Zena, K.K., 2020. Comparative Experimental and Numerical Investigations on the Characteristics of Air/Water Slug Flow in Horizontal Pipes. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences 65(2), pp. 264-285.

Vancouver
Hussain HA, Zahid IA, Rune WT, Zena KK. Comparative Experimental and Numerical Investigations on the Characteristics of Air/Water Slug Flow in Horizontal Pipes. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences. 2020;65(2): 264-285.

REFERENCES

[1] Sharma, Y., M. Ihara, and R. Manabe. “Simulating slug flow in Hilly-Terrain pipelines.” In SPE International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition in Mexico. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2002.
[2] Godhavn, John-Morten, Mehrdad P. Fard, and Per H. Fuchs. “New slug control strategies, tuning rules and experimental results.” Journal of Process Control 15, no. 5 (2005): 547-557.
[3] Issa, R. I., and M. H. W. Kempf. “Simulation of slug flow in horizontal and nearly horizontal pipes with the two-fluid model.” International Journal of Multiphase Flow 29, no. 1 (2003): 69-95.
[4] Sanchis, Arnaud, George W. Johnson, and Atle Jensen. “The formation of hydrodynamic slugs by the interaction of waves in gas–liquid two-phase pipe flow.” International Journal of Multiphase Flow 37, no. 4 (2011): 358-368.
[5] Sharma, S., S. Lewis, and G. Kojasoy. “Local studies in horizontal gas–liquid slug flow.” Nuclear Engineering and Design 184, no. 2-3 (1998): 305-318.
[6] Dukler, Abraham E., and Martin G. Hubbard. “A model for gas-liquid slug flow in horizontal and near horizontal tubes.” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 14, no. 4 (1975): 337-347.
[7] Nicholson, M. K. “K., Aziz, and GA Gregory. “Intermittent two phase flow in horizontal pipes: Predictive Models.” Can. J. Chem. Eng 56 (1978): 653-663.
[8] Gregory, G. A., M. K. Nicholson, and K. Aziz. “Correlation of the liquid volume fraction in the slug for horizontal gas-liquid slug flow.” International Journal of Multiphase Flow 4, no. 1 (1978): 33-39.
[9] Scott, Stuart L., Ovadia Shoham, and James P. Brill. “Prediction of slug length in horizontal, large-diameter pipes.” SPE Production Engineering 4, no. 3 (1989): 335-340.
[10] Nydal, O. J., Sandro Pintus, and Paolo Andreussi. “Statistical characterization of slug flow in horizontal pipes.” International Journal of Multiphase Flow 18, no. 3 (1992): 439-453.
[11] Fan, Z., F. Lusseyran, and T. J. Hanratty. “Initiation of slugs in horizontal gas?liquid flows.” AIChE Journal 39, no. 11 (1993): 1741-1753.
[12] Woods, Bennett D., and Thomas J. Hanratty. “Influence of Froude number on physical processes determining frequency of slugging in horizontal gas–liquid flows.” International Journal of Multiphase Flow 25, no. 6-7 (1999): 1195-1223.
[13] Mohmmed, Abdalellah O., Hussain H. Al-Kayiem, Mohammad S. Nasif, and Rune W. Time. “Effect of slug flow frequency on the mechanical stress behavior of pipelines.” International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 172 (2019): 1-9.
[14] Carneiro, J. N. E., R. Fonseca Jr, A. J. Ortega, R. C. Chucuya, A. O. Nieckele, and L. F. A. Azevedo. “Statistical characterization of two-phase slug flow in a horizontal pipe.” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 33, no. SPE1 (2011): 251-258.
[15] Al-Kayiem, Hussain H., Abdalellah O. Mohmmed, Zahid I. Al-Hashimy, and Rune W. Time. “Statistical assessment of experimental observation on the slug body length and slug translational velocity in a horizontal pipe.” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 105 (2017): 252-260.
[16] López, Jorge, Hugo Pineda, David Bello, and Nicolás Ratkovich. “Study of liquid–gas two-phase flow in horizontal pipes using high speed filming and computational fluid dynamics.” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 76 (2016): 126-134.
[17] Pineda-Pérez, H., T. Kim, E. Pereyra, and N. Ratkovich. “CFD modeling of air and highly viscous liquid two-phase slug flow in horizontal pipes.” Chemical Engineering Research and Design 136 (2018): 638-653.
[18] Mohmmed, Abdalellah O., Mohammad S. Nasif, Hussain H. Al-Kayiem, and Rune W. Time. “Measurements of translational slug velocity and slug length using an image processing technique.” Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 50 (2016): 112-120.
[19] Mohmmed, A. O. I. “Effect of Slug Two-Phase Flow on Fatigue of Pipe Material.” (2016).
[20] IAEA, TECDOC. “1585 Measurement uncertainty: A practical guide for secondary standards dosimetry laboratories.” IAEA, Vienna (2008).
[21] Pinilla, Jorge Andres, Esteban Guerrero, Hugo Pineda, Raquel Posada, Eduardo Pereyra, and Nicolas Ratkovich. “CFD modeling and validation for two-phase medium viscosity oil-air flow in horizontal pipes.” Chemical Engineering Communications 206, no. 5 (2019): 654-671.
[22] Rashimi, W., T. S. Y. Choong, T. G. Chuah, S. A. Hussain, and M. Khalid. “Effect of interphase forces on two phase liquid: liquid flow in horizontal pipe.” Inst Eng 71 (2010): 35-40.
[23] Frank, Thomas. “Numerical simulation of slug flow regime for an air-water two-phase flow in horizontal pipes.” In Proceedings of the 11th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal-Hydraulics (NURETH-11), Avignon, France, October, pp. 2-6. 2005.
[24] Khalid Al-Jassim. “Numerical simulations of stratified two and three phase turbulent flows in pipelines.” PhD thesis, University of Basrah, Iraq, 2009.
[25] Iacovides, H., G. Kelemenis, and M. Raisee. “Flow and heat transfer in straight cooling passages with inclined ribs on opposite walls: an experimental and computational study.” Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 27, no. 3 (2003): 283-294.
[26] Menter, Florian R. “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications.” AIAA Journal 32, no. 8 (1994): 1598-1605.
[27] Yang, Yi, Ming Gu, and Xinyang Jin. “New inflow boundary conditions for modeling the neutral equilibrium atmospheric boundary layer in SST k-? model.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerod (2012).
[28] Wilcox, David C. Turbulence modeling for CFD. Vol. 2. La Canada, CA: DCW industries, 1998.
[29] Al-Hashimy, Z. I., H. H. Al-Kayiem, Z. K. Kadhim, and A. O. Mohmmed. “Numerical simulation and pressure drop prediction of slug flow in oil/gas pipelines.” Computational Methods in Multiphase Flow 8, no. 89 (2015): 57.
[30] Aagaard, Olav. “Hydroelastic analysis of flexible wedges.” Master’s thesis, Institutt for Marin Teknikk, 2013.
[31] Chica, Leonardo. “FSI study of internal multiphase flow in subsea piping components.” MSc thesis, University of Houston, 2014.
[32] Ferré, Daniel. “Écoulements diphasiques à poches en conduite horizontale.” La Houille Blanche 6-7 (1979): 378-381.
[33] Woods, Bennett David. “Slug formation and frequency of slugging in gas-liquid flows.” PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1998.
[34] Kordyban, Eugene. “Some details of developing slugs in horizontal two?phase flow.” AIChE Journal 31, no. 5 (1985): 802-806.
[35] Ban, Sam, William Pao, and Mohammad Shakir Nasif. “Numerical simulation of two-phase flow regime in horizontal pipeline and its validation.” International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow 28, no. 6 (2018): 1279-1314.